Powerbasic Museum 2020-B

IT-Consultant: Patrice Terrier => Discussion => Topic started by: Frederick J. Harris on June 24, 2014, 09:40:24 PM

Title: Interesting Comments On C++
Post by: Frederick J. Harris on June 24, 2014, 09:40:24 PM
It appears the tide has finally turned away from OOP, design patterns, templates, and several other hallowed C++ entities ...

http://c0de517e.blogspot.ca/2014/06/where-is-my-c-replacement.html

I wonder how many C++ coders are like myself and really code more with C-isms than pure template based propper C++?  I see comments to that affect more and more.  And that article flushes out in the open some of those ideas.  Many of the links given are also interesting. 
Title: Re: Interesting Comments On C++
Post by: Charles Pegge on June 25, 2014, 11:12:06 AM
Interesting blog, and the comments too.

I think OOP is needed for dealing with multiple items: controls, particles and animations, but offers no advantage for implementing a program's core functions.

The natural extension of the OOP concepts is a database - with records and fields, we are back on familiar territory.
Title: Re: Interesting Comments On C++
Post by: Patrice Terrier on June 25, 2014, 02:05:49 PM
Using arrays of structure(s), altogether with procedural coding style, is my moto  :)

...